- Big Hosts Are Better, oops
- Posted by McWebber on September 8th, 2003
http://www.computerworld.com/securit...,84675,00.html
"Visitors to those infected Interland-hosted sites were in turn vulnerable
to having their systems compromised by code that could allow them to be
turned into proxy servers, a security expert said last week."
--
McWebber
No email replies read
If someone tells you to forward an email to all your friends
please forget that I'm your friend.
- Posted by William Tasso on September 8th, 2003
McWebber wrote:
you just gotta love journos - "malicious HTML code"
--
William Tasso - http://WilliamTasso.com
- Posted by Igor Slyusar on September 8th, 2003
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003 21:26:10 +0100, William Tasso wrote:
Not HTML, but JavaScript maybe, which may be indeed malicious for Windows
Internet Explorer users. Sorry, William, but it's a fact.
--
Regards, Igor Slyusar.
http://www.slyusar.com [08.09.2003 23:54:45]
- Posted by Tina - AffordableHOST.com on September 8th, 2003
"Igor Slyusar" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:15wxxzmv5rpew.udb2pi5r04jr.dlg@40tude.net...
That was his point. :P
--Tina
- Posted by Matthias Gutfeldt on September 8th, 2003
William Tasso schrieb:
Yeah, well, you might be laughing, but those bastarts even have a
specification[1] for Cross-Site Scripting!
Matthias
[1] <http://w3.org/TR/CSS2/>
- Posted by EightNineThree on September 8th, 2003
"Igor Slyusar" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:15wxxzmv5rpew.udb2pi5r04jr.dlg@40tude.net...
The article said "HTML code".
HTML does nothing except state the structure of a document.
--
Karl Core
Charles Sweeney says my sig is fine as it is.
- Posted by Igor Slyusar on September 8th, 2003
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003 17:32:16 -0400, EightNineThree wrote:
Yes, you're right. But believe me there's no difference for
non-professional between HTML code and JavaScript inside HTML code. If that
article was written by non-professional, I can forgive that mistake.
--
Regards, Igor Slyusar.
http://www.slyusar.com [09.09.2003 1:04:04]
- Posted by William Tasso on September 8th, 2003
Igor Slyusar wrote:
The article is published in the securitytopics section of computerworld.com.
Their readers have a right to expect professionalism in the subject matter
as well as the craft.
That sort of nonsense has no place outside of a <newbie></newbie>
disclaimer.
--
William Tasso - http://WilliamTasso.com
- Posted by Charles Sweeney on September 9th, 2003
"Igor Slyusar" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:15wxxzmv5rpew.udb2pi5r04jr.dlg@40tude.net...
Understanding William's post, I think you should tell that to the
journalist!
"journos" = journalists.
--
Charles Sweeney
www.CharlesSweeney.com
- Posted by David Venn-Brown on September 9th, 2003
Igor Slyusar wrote:
Javascript sounds slightly too soft and cuddly though. HTML, because it
is an acronym sounds a lot more imposing, so 'malicious HTML code'
sounds heaps better than 'malicious javscript'.
