- Anybody use Amaya?
- Posted by Arne on February 22nd, 2004
Many times I have seen postings (Q and A) about editors. But as I
recall I have not seen any discussion about the editor from W3C called
Amaya. So I would like your comments on that. :-)
What do you "professionals" have to say about Amaya as web editor? Is
it something I can use and also recommend to someone that is a newbee
on web editing and can't any HTML coding? Maybee to update the site
after it's delivered? What is your pro's and con's about it?
--
/Arne (Sweden)
- Posted by Makrobicz on February 22nd, 2004
"Arne" <arne.luras@telia.com> wrote in message
news:il8_b.49933$mU6.199515@newsb.telia.net...
I personally use Amaya. Not for HTML but XML and particularly SVG.
--
"He [Jimmy White] has popped out to the toilet to compose himself before the
final push."
(STEVE DAVIS, BBC2)
http://www.private-eye.co.uk
- Posted by Arne on February 22nd, 2004
Makrobicz wrote:
Thank's for the reply M. So I understand you still prefer some other
editor for (X)HTML and CSS? If so, why?
P.S. Maybee the subject should be "Anybody use(d) Amaya, so others may
reply to :-)
--
/Arne
- Posted by Phil Roberts on February 22nd, 2004
With total disregard for any kind of safety measures Arne
<arne.luras@telia.com> leapt forth and uttered:
Tried it once. I equate the experience with trying to swim with both
my arms broken and stapled to my back.
--
Phil Roberts | Dork Pretending To Be Hard | http://www.flatnet.net/
- Posted by Makrobicz on February 22nd, 2004
"Arne" <arne.luras@telia.com> wrote in message
news:dea_b.49944$mU6.199514@newsb.telia.net...
I think it is a pretty poor environment for (X)HTML as the interface is slow
and prone to crashes. I use CuteFTP and that comes with CuteHTML so I use
that for most applications.
--
"He [Jimmy White] has popped out to the toilet to compose himself before the
final push."
(STEVE DAVIS, BBC2)
http://www.private-eye.co.uk
- Posted by William Starr Moake on February 23rd, 2004
On Sun, 22 Feb 2004 16:58:41 -0600, Phil Roberts
<philrob@HOLYflatnetSHIT.net> wrote:
I agree. The interface is a bitch to work with.
- Posted by Eric Jarvis on February 23rd, 2004
Phil Roberts philrob@HOLYflatnetSHIT.net wrote:
people have such STRANGE hobbies
--
eric
www.ericjarvis.co.uk
"live fast, die only if strictly necessary"
- Posted by Arne on February 23rd, 2004
William Starr Moake wrote:
Thank's guys! So I think Amaya is nothing to consider. That's pity
because I was hoping W3C that is "responible" for the standards would
work out an simple to use HTML-editor that can give valid HTML, as an
option to all those editors that don't do that but that WYSIWYG users
use today. :-)
--
/Arne
- Posted by Charles Sweeney on February 23rd, 2004
"Arne" <arne.luras@telia.com> wrote in message
news:W2k_b.49969$mU6.199793@newsb.telia.net...
If it's W3C then it will be complicated and convoluted just to keep with
their elitist, esoteric mindset.
If the masses understand it, then they are losing, and they will deprecate
it and make a new, more confusing, one.
--
Charles Sweeney
www.CharlesSweeney.com
- Posted by Arne on February 23rd, 2004
Charles Sweeney wrote:
:-)
--
/Arne
