- Google always behind?
- Posted by Timmermans on December 8th, 2005
Hi,
Since a month now I am following my sites position in Google. I notice that
it updates it's results daily, but that the date displayed below the results
is always 2 days behind. So it knows I update te site daily, but it only
let's me know 2 days later.
Why this delay?
Interesting, MSN displays the same behaviour!
Regards,
Steven
- Posted by Luigi Donatello Asero on December 8th, 2005
"Timmermans" <steventimmermans@yahoo.co.uk> skrev i meddelandet
news:439794fa$1_2@news.tm.net.my...
Are you sure that it did not happen before as well?
--
Luigi Donatello Asero
https://www.scaiecat-spa-gigi.com/sv...lle-daosta.php
- Posted by Timmermans on December 8th, 2005
Luigi Donatello Asero wrote:
My question was not if it has happened before, but why this happens.
Does it really take two days to crunch the numbers?
Steven
- Posted by Luigi Donatello Asero on December 8th, 2005
"Timmermans" <steventimmermans@yahoo.co.uk> skrev i meddelandet
news:1134012492.586275.46310@g14g2000cwa.googlegro ups.com...
Perhaps it is a part of a strategy. Search engines do not want to reveal
their results before they have put them in order.
--
Luigi Donatello Asero
https://www.scaiecat-spa-gigi.com/sv/index.php
- Posted by Borek on December 8th, 2005
On Thu, 08 Dec 2005 04:28:12 +0100, Timmermans
<steventimmermans@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
Probably - that's not only number crunching, results must propagate to
all datacenters. As it is world-wide enterprise I would say 48 hours
is not a bad result.
Best,
Borek
--
http://www.chembuddy.com
http://www.chembuddy.com/?left=EBAS&...-stoichiometry
http://www.chembuddy.com/?left=BATE&...ion_equilibria
http://www.chembuddy.com/?left=CASC&...n_calcul ator
- Posted by Roy Schestowitz on December 8th, 2005
__/ [Luigi Donatello Asero] on Thursday 08 December 2005 04:45 \__
What was your site's address again? Did you define a crawling cycle in the
meta? Although it is said to be ignored by crawlers, I once set mine set to
2 days. As I browse through some random deep pages in Google cache, I see a
5-day delay, a 6-day delay... The front page has a 2-day delay.
<meta name="ROBOTS" content="ALL">
<meta name="ROBOTS" content="index">
<meta name="ROBOTS" content="follow">
<meta name="REVISIT-AFTER" content="2 days">
Roy
- Posted by Timmermans on December 8th, 2005
"Roy Schestowitz" <newsgroups@schestowitz.com> wrote in message
news:dn8rh1$1gl5$1@godfrey.mcc.ac.uk...
My page maleisie.be
I have a <meta name="ROBOTS" content="ALL"> tag going on...
You say search engines might not want to reveal results before putting them
in order... but the number of page indexed (as shown) by Google varies to
much... with give or take about 400.000 pages, with a maximum best of
2.300.000... this means that, wether or not it visited all sites/pages or
takes them in account, the results are hardly ever what they need to be.
Steven
- Posted by Big Bill on December 8th, 2005
On Thu, 8 Dec 2005 19:43:02 +0800, "Timmermans"
<steventimmermans@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
Gawd knows why...what do you think it does?
BB
--
www.kruse.co.uk/ seo@kruse.demon.co.uk
The buffalo have gone
- Posted by Timmermans on December 8th, 2005
"Big Bill" <kruse@cityscape.co.uk> wrote in message
news:c1dgp198g3u2gp6rkqrnvu7afkjqd6kcq7@4ax.com...
Just as much as having none at all what searchengines is concerned. But I'm
running a search script on my site that actually does make use of these tags
including other standard meta tags to build up desciptions, give value and
weight to pages.
I could delete these tags all together I'm sure, but I figure there's no
harm in a couple of extra bytes just to get that angle covered in case it
should have some effect. I think it might be usefull for metasearchers like
ixquick or so. You never know 'old school' might become a fashion again.
Steven
